Welcome to the 21st century where more and more people are more educated by the things they see on various social media platforms instead of their educational system or other credible sources. More and more, things are measured by the quantity and not the quality and masses are so easily drawn to a crab mentality that it is difficult to think that justice can be achievable in this society, especially in this day and age.
Take, for example, the idea of criminal defense.
Social media allows for people to get their cyber pitchforks and torches in order to burn down anyone else who made one tiny mistake. These masses are also capable, then, of influencing jurors. More and more crime shows are getting romanticized on both the small screen and the silver screen and quite a lot of them believe that the information that they glean from these interpretations can be concluded as actual fact. Most of the time, however, it isn’t.
So with all of that external influence into the defense system, one has to wonder: can criminal defense still be fair?
With everyone’s opinion possibly factoring in on the spectrum of what is and isn’t right – what about the individual on trial? According to the website of Brent Horst, Attorney at Law, good people are sometimes put on trial without first understanding the process or knowing what they can do in defense of the accusation. Some people might argue that getting a criminal defense attorney would be as good as admitting guilt to the crime when, in reality, it is the aid of a reputable and experienced criminal defense attorney that allows for a defendant’s best chance at a just and fair trial.Read More